Felafel is the only food that I have
seen that actually sparks political debate. There are people out
there in this world whose job is actually to defend the name of their
home country in the name of felafel.
Much like most things involving Israel
and the rest of the Middle East, there has to be political feuds
arising from felafel. And like pretty much anything likable involving
a country within a 100 mile radius of Greece, the Greeks want to lay
claim to it. Though the roots of where these fried croquettes of
chickpeas and remain ambiguous, the earliest record of felafel being
made was in Northern Levant, a region of the Middle East boarding
Turkey, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the Mediterranean, as shown below.
So it can be concluded that felafel was most likely created either in ancient Lebanon or Syria.
So it can be concluded that felafel was most likely created either in ancient Lebanon or Syria.
Firstly, I would like to address the
common misconception that felafel is Greek. So, this is actually an
interesting situation, felafel did not start getting associated with
Greek cuisine until a Greek food trend hit the United States in the 1980s, where along with gyros and souvlaki, felafel was served just for
fun, cause it goes in a pita, like those two. Since Americans seemed
to enjoy it under the impression that if it looks Greek and tastes
Greek it was Greek, Greek Americans stared to claim it as their own.
A common argument comes up by the Greeks regarding different foods
such as Baklava (Lebanon,) Kebab (Persia/Iran) and pretty much
EVERYTHING TURKISH that at one point, these nations were part of the
Greek empire, therefore because the Greeks were there at one point,
it is officially Greek. Now, there is some influence Greek culture
has had on the cultures of places like Turkey or Lebanon and vise
versa don't get me wrong, but just because the Greeks owned a certian
land mass at one point, it doesn’t mean that the Greek ethnic group
inhabited it. To offer a couple of examples of why this argument is
flawed, think about the cuisine of Puerto Rico, it is owned by the
United States, but you would not then say that their cultural dishes
of Mofongo or Lechon are American, because they were made by the
Puerto Rican ethnic group. In the same sense, though Lebanon was
owned by the Greeks at one point, the Arabic ethnic group still
inhabited that area and were the ones making and eating felafel,
therefore, in what sense is it Greek? As a more extreme example, look
below at the map of all of the land that was at one point owned by
Great Britain:
Though the Great Britain owned more
than 75% of the world at one point, these countries were still
inhabited by unique ethnic groups. So lets take the argument applied
by the Greeks and see what happenes if the British used this logic.
Chinese food? BRITISH. Argentinian food? BRITISH. American food?
BRITISH. Indian food? BRITISH. If the logic of “I owned you at one
point, therefore what is yours is actually mine,”were true
everything Greek would in fact be British. And its funny because
until felafel became popular in the United States, the Greeks did not
care about felafel and, they don't even eat felafel in Greece.
I would just like to say, between
scenarios that what I blog either about Greece, Israel or the rest of
the Middle East does not reflect my views regarding Greek politics,
Middle Eastern politics, national security or the Israeli/Palestinian
tragedies.
Okay, now time for Israel, so the
argument for felafel being Israeli is actually opposite of that of it
being Greek, given that the State of Israel was not formed until the
late 1940s, felafel had already been created and had traveled all
over the Arab world. The Israeli view on felafel is that they adopted
it into their culture and cuisine, therefore it is Israeli. Yes
felafel is eaten widely in Israel, however it was there when they got
there, the Israeli people had no input on the creation of felafel.
There were no ethnic Israelis in Levant when felafel was being made
either. Now, Israel does have its own unique cuisine, similar to
Arabic cuisine, but with a lot of European influence, felafel just
happens to be included. This has caused actual political debates as
to who can technically claim it the Israelis or the Arabs, much like
the Israeli Lebanese “hummus war” (look it up, its a thing.) What
it all comes down to is yes, felafel is part of both cuisines,
however, it was made way before the State of Israel was established,
so it is not an Israeli food.
Just think, if you have not tried
felafel yet just how good it is, considering how everyone wants to
claim it. And one can assume from this post what my next recipe will be for, felafel
No comments:
Post a Comment